Architecture o'Density.

If I want to make my life tougher, more difficult in order to put more sense to it [make it more meaningful], what the point of reproaches and criticism is, from people from all walks of life, when all they are struggling to perform is the same [as me] thing too. No objectivity due to the diversity of widely comprehended forms. Their whole systematics was invented , not cos the modern is better from the previous one but owing to the variety of personae , their characters etc. [to cut long story short]. More to the point, the invention of how remarkable literary periods is nothing short of extracting the fads, trends that came into fashion of the whimsical citizen who bold enough dared to reveal them to the society [the fad thirsty]and being charismatic enough to convince the rest of the hemisphere's citizens to [follow] it. Owing to diversity the human psyche carries, there were people who once saw the current moods were [world] weary of 'em, so that they come up with sth that suited their preferences more. there were some other entities who also found out the new trend suits them better too. Those can be divided into 3 groups: those who really were in need of a new either philosophical or what ever human connected field o'science, or those bold enough to think up with sth entirely new, or those brain washed, the proverbial grey mob that can't stand being left in the back as they fell a constant urge to be with the latest. Just a certain feature of their character. Thanks to them many trends have been established as they helped prevail them n come into popularity. The latter of which, however, they cannot take as all their credit . The more popular sth becomes, the more bored people of it are n that causes shifts into other, new currents. So, maybe it's not that bad, in the end? It's not cos the previous was out of the contemporary times, wasn't catching up or was not fresh any more or stopped working. The reason for perpetually developing schemata, forms, patterns lies in personae cos of its diversity. As every entity differs in tiny ,finest details from the other one. This is why so many forms, schemata etc., are needed-to make sth individual for every person[ality]. To make sth personal for every individual. Yeah, that grasps the thought. Some people, the maverick ones as it usually happens to be, spotted a niche of unploughed. From their experience or simply brazenness, infinity of inexorable creativity, they're convinced, their idea's gonna sprout n flourish amongst the folks. Forms, schemata etc., are divergent between one another for all sorts of people. Even a tiny bit of difference makes it easier for a person to take up n facilitates assimilation, adaptation, dovetailing speaking extreme cases. Nothing's bad n nothing's good objectively. It's all about what we believe in, what we want to believe is better than the other one according to our own rules n beliefs [n life rules]. Formula inventors did not come up with all the stuff just to trashen our minds or cut down trees, or cos they had nothing better to do but in every 'period' there is the cream of the crop which pushes forward, showing, giving the others road directions. Despite of being brilliant they do need the grey rest. How come? All leaders would not be leaders if they had no crowd of devoted followers. Once again, the conclusion emerges to be so rural life simplified-all sorts pursues harmony.